Searching and Inclusion & Exclusion

Search architecture

Six Web of Science blocks covering four intersecting domains, plus two intersection queries that isolate the focal set. Blocks are constructed to be individually interpretable — each answers “what exists on this topic” — while the intersections answer “what exists at the gap”.

Block Focus Expected yield
A TOE × digital transformation × SME ~250
B TOE × nonlinear or interaction effects ~80
C P-E Fit × technology or organization ~150
D RSM × congruence × management or IS ~100
E DT training effectiveness × SME ~300
F TOE × fit or alignment ~50

Intersection queries

Query Purpose Expected yield
A AND B TOE + DT + nonlinear — the focal set ~20–40
(A OR F) AND C TOE + fit precedents ~15–30

Combined raw yield before deduplication: approximately 880–1,300 records. The small size of the intersection sets is itself the evidence for the gap — if A AND B returned hundreds of records, the study’s premise would not hold.

Inclusion criteria

  • Indexed in SSCI or SCIE
  • Web of Science category: Management, Information Science, or Business
  • Document type: Article or Review
  • Published 2010–2026, with foundational works from 2000–2009 admitted where they are canonical for a construct

Exclusion criteria

  • Conference abstracts, editorials, book reviews, and other non-peer-reviewed material
  • Studies outside the management, IS, and business domains
  • Studies with no empirical or theoretical bearing on technology adoption, congruence, or training effectiveness

Screening

Screening follows PRISMA: identification, deduplication, title and abstract screening, full-text assessment, and inclusion, with counts and exclusion reasons recorded at each stage.

Synthesis pipeline

Retrieved records are processed through ScholarRAG, a staged review-automation pipeline operating in systematic-review mode with a target corpus of 50–300 papers after screening. The pipeline supports extraction and synthesis; inclusion decisions and interpretation remain manual.

PRISMA

Stage-by-stage counts are reported in the manuscript. They are not reproduced here because the corpus is subject to the same revision cycle as the analysis.